Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Idols

I love American Idol. Yes, no fear...I love American Idol.

My favs as of now...
1. Sanjaya - i think he is young and comes off as such, but i like his voice when he gets into it. I am doubtful he will make it the distance...comes off too shy and lacking of conviction when singing
2. I like the beat boxer...i think there is more singing goodness than people realize.
3. Laquisha - that woman can belt it. She's not cocky...just a bank telling mom trying to make it.
4. Chris Sligh- He looks like the smart kid from Accepted. He uses humor, probably a defense mechanism from being picked on as a kid, but i actually like the way he sings.
5. Sundance Head - His audition good, everything else has sucked...will he bring it or will he live on his daddy's laurels.

Apply Heat

Dwayne Wade...is this guy always getting hurt? Good thing he got the championship under his belt before he became Grant Hill.

Why are the pistons not better than they are. They should have 3 rings by now and they only have 1. They got C-webb now and still aren't on fire. what gives? Did they all go from being tossed from team to team only to find the dream set up and once they got the respect they can go back to under acheiving? I don't think any one of them really wants respect. Once Big ben got it, he left. The rest of the team when they were declared a lock to win 70 games and win the title they gave it all up.

Why aren't the nuggets better than they are? Is there no defense or is it really just 2 guys vs. 5?

Where did Gilbert Arenas come from and how come the wizards are all of a sudden legitimate? or is this a head fake?

Did pippen say that any GM would prefer him over MJ? I am the first to say that pippen never got full respect...but at the same time he did get chosen as one of the 50 greatest players. But come on don't you think, pippen, you are crossing the line. I still think you had a shot at the finals when you were with the trailblazers and you fouled out in game 7 vs. the lakers. You had the give up look in your eyes.

Monday, February 12, 2007

Case in Point

The UVA contra-indicator still holds...yes the season is not over yet...but easy to count against them when hype is high. I should be a gambler. [it wouldn't be gambling though, it would be like betting on a drugged horse...a sure thing]

"Virginia [15-7 (8-3), RPI: 34, SOS: 23] Ouch. After the ESPN.com love on Friday, the Cavaliers waltzed into Blacksburg and got blasted by the Hokies. This is still one of the nation's most impressive in-season turnarounds, though. Left for dead after the Puerto Rico disaster and (competitive) losses to Stanford, UNC and BC, the Cavaliers ripped off seven wins in a row and have an very manageable schedule the rest of the way. The computer numbers are OK for now (but won't be helped by the game against Longwood) but that probably won't matter because UVA looks a good bet for 11 ACC wins. They also have beaten Arizona and Gonzaga."
---ESPN.com Article

Saturday, February 10, 2007

The Contra Indicator

This ESPN Article highlights that UVA mens basketball is tied for the lead in the ACC conference (with BC). What? Say that again? When was the last time that UVA was profiled by ESPN or any other national report for that matter?

I remember a time 2 yrs ago when UVA was ranked higher and more favored in football against Florida State at Florida State...are you kidding me? That was a clear opportunity to bet against UVA.

While it would be great to celebrate the Cavs potential return to glory (a relative term), especially after a recent win over Duke (i know they are not the best duke team we have seen, but it's still duke, c'mon), it seems now that a safer position will to hold back optimism and bet against the Wahoos.

For those of us who remember UVA's last great season...1994-1995, with Junior Burrough leading the Cavs to the elite 8. Junior who? yeah Burrough...He played barely a season in the NBA, got bounced to Europe and who knows where he is now. (though let's not forget other lost stars - Harold Deane and Curtis "3 Point" Staples)

After perpetual 1st round exits in the tourney AND THE NIT (aye!), withholding judgment can only be prudent.

Tuesday, January 09, 2007

A Coppola at heart

I happened to catch a fine Nicolas Cage movie re-run on TV over the weekend, Gone in 60 Seconds. Nicolas Cage is one of my favorite actors and is incredibly prolific. I ranked my favorite Nick Cage movies (that i have seen) below. [note: there are many still left to see.] And I can't tell you how excited I am that they are making the sequel to National Treasure.

Top Tier (in rank order)
National Treasure
Gone in Sixty Seconds
Face/Off
Leaving Las Vegas
The Family Man
The Rock
City of Angels
Honeymoon in Vegas
Moonstruck

2nd Tier (in rank order)
Matchstick Men
Kiss of Death
Con Air
Guarding Tess
It Could Happen to You
Lord of War
The Weather Man
8MM
Snake Eyes
Raising Arizona

Friday, January 05, 2007

Education is one of the best donations

I like what Oprah Winfrey has done with opening a school for young women. With all the possible causes in the world, aids, hunger, civil injustices, etc, there is a lot of help devoted to these issues..but I think it is important to remember that good education helps solve a lot of these problems from the beginning before they become problems. Starting with education is a great long term solution to a lot of issues.

Thursday, December 28, 2006

Billy Beane...next move basketball?

In an article by the always interesting Malcolm Gladwell (author of the tipping point and Blink), he writes about a book which goes through analyzing basketball players much in the way that Moneyball analyzed baseball players. The conclusions are as obvious as what you would expect from statistical analysis which is number of points is not the only thing. This is the article. I will be interested to read the book. It seems to me though that there better be something more substantive than just efficiency. It is one thing to score 30 points on 15 shots vs. scoring 30 points on 60 shots....but it is hardly the same thing to say a guy who puts up 10 points on 10 shots is more valuable than a guy who puts up 30 points on 40 shots. You always need someone who can deliver even if it is in a less efficient way...unless....you could construct a whole team of efficient guys. Jordan should hire beane for the bobcats!

Thursday, December 14, 2006

The Answer my friends is blowing in the wind

ESPN.com readers have incorrectly voted. 64% of them say that Allen Iverson would not be a good fit in Miami. And they are dead wrong. Miami landing AI puts them back in the finals and winning another championship. Right now Wade has to carry the team. Shaq won't be back for a month. You put 2 legitimate 30 point scorers on the same team with Shaq in the post and you tell me what is going to happen. Someone has to get double teamed which leaves 2 other guys wide open. I think with that combo you all of a sudden become a threat for years. Shaq doesn't have to be as much of a cornerstone as he ages. I think AI has a couple of years left - he's shown no signs yet of slowing. Get rid of everyone else and pick up 2 league minimum guys as forwards.

Monday, December 11, 2006

How can we be more lucky?

Quote of the Day:

"What we call luck, what we call chance, is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. If you stay ready, you ain't gotta get ready."
-- Will Smith, USA Today, 12/6/06

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Rooting for the Underdog

By definition the Underdogs are more likely to lose than win. Denver and the Giants, on sunday while showing signs of life, are proof of that.

Friday, December 01, 2006

NFL - where to root

I find myself rooting for the Big G, the Giants of New York. Maybe it is because it is Tiki's last year (who would have thought a small back like him would have had such a good career), but also more recently because the Giants now seem to be the underdogs in an NFC conference that is wide open. Big game this weekend. Always fun to root for a team with low expectations, if they do anything positive, it will be a fun thing to be a part of.

Switching to the AFC. Denver...I sure hope Jay Cutler has some Tony Romo in him. After the snake, Plummer, botched Denver's superbowl chances last year in the playoffs, there is no love lost in Denver for that guy. Always a poor performer in the clutch, Jake Plummer has yet to prove otherwise. Shanahan is too good of a coach to settle for mediocrity. He and Terrell Davis gave Elway what he deserved 2 superbowl WINS. 5 Superbowls for elway...is that some kind of record?

Yes I looked it up on his official website. Elways 5 starts as a QB in the Superbowl is a record.

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Vaughn and Psycho - does that make sense?

What happened to the middle of Vince Vaughn’s career?

Vegas baby! Vegas!...coined by Vince Vaughn. His Trent in Swingers, his coup de grace, arc de triumph, a personal masterpiece. 26 yrs old and the master of his craft…but that was 1996 and since what happened to Vaughn? He led in roles in Clay Pigeons and the Psyco remake…why? That is not Vince Vaughn. It is not until 2003, 7 yrs later, that we see Vaughn’s masterpiece “Trent” come back. Thankfully he comes back in a movie that saves comedy…Old School. Dodgeball then slips into the mix, but he rescues himself with the record breaking Wedding Crashers. Vaughn clearly and finally at this point recognizes where his bread is buttered. He produces The Break-up which is a reprisal of the “Trent” character, but while a mild success at the box office, the plot line is weak…Does Vaughn have another comedic classic in him…or are we destined to see Clay Pigeons return? Thankfully his upcoming line up is Old School 2 and Joe Claus…fitting to the saying “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”

Friday, November 17, 2006

Interesting Bush Manuevering

This editorial in the USA today offeres an interesting hypothetical. Give the Republican party a boost going into 2008 by changing out Vice Presidents. Bump cheney and give an 08 hopeful some spotlight. That said while it is interesting to think about, who wants to be associated with the president with a 38% job approval rating?


Cheney is toast, so new veep in works?
Updated 11/16/2006 10:17 PM ET

Now it's all about the White House in 2008. With midterm ballots barely counted, they started lining up on both sides of the aisle this week. Before it's over, expect 10 or 12 Democrats and four or five Republicans to make a serious run for the Oval Office.
In modern politics, the party in power with a two-term president has had a vice president waiting to move up. Those nominations have been almost automatic. History over the past half century:
Bill Clinton's VP Al Gore in 2000. Ronald Reagan's George H.W. Bush 18 years ago. Lyndon Johnson's Hubert Humphrey in 1968. Dwight Eisenhower's Richard Nixon 46 years ago.
Dick Cheney unequivocally has taken himself out of the running. So he's toast.
It's hard to think of a good reason he should remain in office and logical to assume that some Republicans are pushing him to leave. It could be on "doctor's orders." He's 65 with serious heart problems.
Bush then could name a vice presidential successor who they hope might be nominated and win in '08. But the appointment would need approval of both houses of Congress. With control shifting to the Democrats in January, time may be of the essence.
Likely on the short might-be list (alphabetically):
•Bill Frist, 54, Senate majority leader from Tennessee.
•Rudy Giuliani, 62, former mayor of New York City.
•John McCain, 70, U.S. senator from Arizona.
•Condoleezza Rice, 52, secretary of State.
If Cheney goes, Bush could make political history by naming the first woman and first black as veep. When presidents are lame ducks, they sometimes think more about what historians will say than about current events.

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Will the real Bush please stand up

Thanks to MSNBC live feed to their website, I was able to watch Bush's address yesterday live. And it was well worth it. What I noticed was nothing short of a sea change before my eyes most specifically during the Q&A. It felt almost as though Bush had awoken from a dream to reality. Or said another way, it felt like I got to see some of the real George Bush during that Q&A. Often he feels scripted and so pro following an agenda. I thought he was very candid and open to new agendas. He did manage to still put in catch phrases in his prepared remarks like his old stand by, "liberty" and a new one "fresh eyes", but in his Q&A again I thought he was very real. And this intuitively makes sense. He's got nothing to fight for any more. He has won his elections and the mid-terms are over...now the real Bush can please stand up. Is GW really the one who wanted go after Iraq, is he really the one that has shaped foreign policy? I am not certain of these answers but if you believe what Woodard has written in his latest book, Bush is not. I am very curious to see what happens over the next 2 yrs.

As for the democrats, winning power is a double edged sword. Because now they are equally responsible for shaping the conversation on what to do in Iraq and foreign policy. It is not easy enough to say what we have done is bad. They now have to say, what do we do from here. This is not an easy answer for anyone and there is no easy solution. The Dems got what they wanted but can they execute? Always a question that lends itself to uncertainty.

Fed-up, Fed-ex, Oops!

So as we've all been closely watching and just waiting for when, Britney Spears divorces Kevin Federline. I chose to spend my waking hours thinking of snappy headlines that would show up today...the one I came up with is "Britney gets K-Fed Up!" Pretty snappy I think. As I see my headline was pretty close to making the front cover of the USA today. Another one I just thought of as another twist on my original..."You can't spell Fed-up without 'K'!"

But in google news search, I see that there were a couple of other journalists with some snappy headlines of their own. I thought Fed-ex was a nice touch. The clear winner in terms of frequency in number of news titles was the Ooops I did it again. I like the thoughtfulness of that one because it ties in the fact that Britney has been divorced twice now. Below is a sampling of some of the unique headlines:

Britney 'K-Fed' up, files for divorce (USA Today cover)
Brit Poised For Comeback; K-Fed Now Fed-Ex
Oops, she did it again - Britney files for divorce from Kevin
Divorce me baby one more time: Britney Spears's marriage over
Britney Spears dumps 'toxic' hubby K-Fed, files for divorce
Britney Spears divorcing former 'Chaotic' co-star Kevin Federline

Tuesday, November 07, 2006

Quote of the Day

With Arnold about to get re-elected governor...I feel it fitting to go back to 2 famous movie quotes.

Dr. Emmett Brown: Then tell me, "Future Boy", who's President in the United States in 1985?
Marty McFly: Ronald Reagan.
Dr. Emmett Brown: Ronald Reagan? The actor? [chuckles in disbelief]
Dr. Emmett Brown: Then who's VICE-President? Jerry Lewis? [later he rushes outside, down a hill and toward his laboratory]
Dr. Emmett Brown: I suppose Jane Wyman is the First Lady!
--Back to the Future

followed by....

"It's not a tumor!"
--"Detective John Kimball", Arnold Schwarzenegger, Kindergarten Cop

Saturday, November 04, 2006

Need a landslide?

What has always been perplexing is the simple question...if the approval rating for the president is so low, why isn't it obvious that the other party [democrats] should be a lock in the mid-term and even presidential elections. This article in the New Yorker was an interesting read, but I'll leave you with one excerpt here:

In a normal democracy, given the state of public opinion and the record of the incumbent government, it would be taken for granted that come next Tuesday the ruling party would be turned out. But, for reasons that have less to do with the wizardry of Karl Rove than with the structural biases of America’s electoral machinery, Democrats enter every race carrying a bag of sand. The Senate’s fifty-five Republicans represent fewer Americans than do its forty-five Democrats. On the House side, Democratic candidates have won a higher proportion of the average district vote than Republicans in four of the five biennial elections since 1994, but—thanks to a combination of gerrymandering and demo-graphics—Republicans remain in the majority. To win back the House, Democrats need something close to a landslide. Their opponents, to judge from their behavior, seem to think they might get one.

Free throws - They're FREE!

I am not in the NBA so it is hard to preach, that said FREE THROWS! This is the only time in basketball where you can take your time, there is no defense, and you get to score points. In tennis the closest equivalent is the serve where you can go at your own pace and hit the ball how you like...however in tennis you not only just have to get it in, you still have to hit a good shot such that your opponent will have difficulty returning. On the free throw line you just have to get it in the basket.

The Spurs lost against the Cavs yesterday. And Pop agrees with me.

An excerpt from an AP article after the game.

The Spurs, one of the most dominant homecourt teams in the NBA, slashed a 13-point deficit in the fourth down to four and might have won if not for a dismal 18-of-34 effort shooting free throws.

"I wish I had a nickel for every time somebody asked me if free throws are a concern," Spurs coach Gregg Popovich said. They have "always been an Achilles' heel."


I say, Put it in the Contract. Let the money do the work. Or Don't let a player leave practice until he makes 8 out of 10 free throws. No excuses.

Thursday, November 02, 2006

The Kerry Follow Up

I thought this was a well written observation of the implications of Kerry's comments as well as highlighting, should we even care when there are really big issues to be talking about? Below is an editorial from the USA Today 11/2/06.

Kerry pries foot from mouth; sound-bite politics escalate
John Kerry said something truly foolish on Monday, suggesting to college students that if they didn't get an education, they'd get "stuck in Iraq." Taken at face value, it was demeaning and offensive, implying that the soldiers fighting for their country are stupid and uneducated.

Under fire from outraged-but-gleeful Republicans, Kerry says that he intended nothing of the kind, that he really meant to make a joke about President Bush, a self-admitted C student who got the nation mired in Iraq. Maybe so. But the Democratic senator from Massachusetts, who has endured a presidential campaign and knows the price for loose talk, compounded the initial error by lashing out at critics and taking two days to apologize.

What to make of the uproar?

At one level, in the maddeningly bland discourse that often passes for political dialogue, rare unscripted moments can offer a revealing window into a candidate. In 1968, Republican presidential hopeful George Romney's admission that he had been "brainwashed" during a military tour of Vietnam suggested a lack of mental toughness. Four years later, when Democrat Ed Muskie appeared to cry in New Hampshire, it raised questions about his emotional stability.

In today's age of talk radio, bloggers and YouTube, such moments just reverberate more loudly and quickly.

Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean's scream after he placed third in the 2004 Iowa caucuses suggested an angry man who lacked self control, torpedoing his campaign. This year, in Virginia, Republican Sen. George Allen's calling an Indian-American Democratic operative "macaca" and singling him out for derision at a campaign event suggested a racially insensitive bully. His re-election, once seemingly assured, is in doubt, as are his presidential aspirations.

Kerry could find his 2008 hopes similarly impaired. His comments reinforced his reputation for having a tin political ear. His initial reaction suggested he was more interested in displaying bristling toughness under fire than in expressing regret for disparaging the troops, including highly educated ones, who volunteered and are proud to serve. Kerry was, after all, once just such a soldier himself. Botched joke or not, the right thing to do was to apologize, which Kerry belatedly and grudgingly did Wednesday.

At another level, the Kerry flap is sadly typical of the sound-bite politics dominating the closing days of a brutally negative campaign.

Future historians might well shake their heads that with the nation bogged down in a failing war and threatened by terrorism, three of the days leading up to a crucial election were dominated by a gaffe by someone who's not even running this year.

Aren't there more important things to talk about? Does any candidate, for instance, have a workable plan for what to do next in Iraq? Or a way to fix the federal budget, immigration policy and the health care system?

These are tough issues. Maybe it's just a lot easier to play "gotcha" politics.

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Kerry and Charisma


Kerry 'stuck in Iraq' remark target of right-wing talkers


Kerry makes what could have been misworded joke..."get a good education or you'll end up stuck in Iraq". Bush and co. used this as an opportunity to say Kerry was calling all the troops stupid. Kerry's office today released the official speech as it was supposed to have been said, "I can't over stress the importance of a great education. Do you know where you end up if you don't study, if you aren't smart, if you're intellectually lazy? You end up getting us stuck in a war in Iraq. Just ask President Bush." How Kerry could have missed all these lines is troubling in itself since he missed the whole crux of the punch line.

Thinking of running again for 2008! Are you kidding me? Kerry needs to get over himself. The reason he got as far as he did in 2004 was because he won in Iowa. Kerry got good grades when Bush got C's, Kerry was an athlete in college when Bush was a cheerleader, Kerry is a decorated war hero when Bush was just a war journalist...Kerry had the backround and the set up to win against Bush the first time around. He botched that opportunity because he couldn't speak a message clearly. I would hear a Kerry speech and walk away feeling like I had no idea what he just said. (though statisticians would say that the good economy at the time would have predicted an incumbent would win). It is quite possible that this comment slip up could end his high political ambitions. Democrats are already trying to distance themself with even Hillary Clinton saying Kerry should apologize (but of course this is self serving, bc she wants one less opponent in the race). He's lost his chance, now let someone else have a go.

The democrats need some one with clear charisma. I think Clinton and Obama have a chance of providing some of that. Obama has proven to be a clear speaker and Clinton can clearly ride the Bill Clinton love fest. Though the concern I have is to win an election you have to win the on the fence voter and I am not sure that either one of the two can do that, which might mean by default there will be a republican winner in the presidential race - who ever that republican turns out to be. Hopefully in this day and age, being african american or being a woman doesn't hold back voters. Where they do have a chance is if America is really craving the freshness that McCain doesn't have to offer. The dark horse = Al Gore. Does he use his lightened personality and humor side to come back into action? The answer is no...money will be behind the Clinton juggernaut. I am no Larry Sabato, but I have my own crystal ball.

Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Youtube and All its Glory

Daily Show: Islam vs. Christianity


GM has turned me on to the wonders of YouTube. And I just love the daily show. Combine the Daily show with Steve Carrell and you have a magic combination.

Monday, October 30, 2006

Happy and Relaxed



Thanks to this submission from GM, I am dying of laughter! This is hilarious...BUT don't dismiss it as just a joke. I firmly believe in the old saying, "laughter is the best medicine." It has been proven in studies that even facial expressions such as smiling can alter your mood and temperment (even if there is nothing to smile about). I saved this clip not only to have a good chuckle but also because I believe this is better than "An apple a day".

Friday, October 13, 2006

Bush and the Buzz

I find President Bush's speeches hilarious. This article in Newsweek is fantastic, recounting President Bush's new buzz word "Caliphate" which he used 4 times in a recent speech. It reminds me of the all too funny Inaguration Speech by Bush when he used the words "Freedom" over 30 times and "Liberty" 20 times. (and if you watch the Daily Show, you saw the funniest skit on television when they did a recut of the president's speech with just the words Freedom and Liberty and did a count off). So Bush has found a new word to add to his 3 buzz word vocabulary of Freedom, Liberty, and Terror...."Caliphate".

From the article...."A caliphate, according to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, is the “office or dominion of a caliph”; a caliph is “a successor of Muhammad ... [the] spiritual head of Islam.” Simply put, the caliph is Islam’s deputy to the world. After the Prophet Muhammad died in 632 A.D., his father-in-law, Abu Bakr, became the first caliph. (At the heart of the schism between Sunni and Shia Muslims, even today, is the question of succession: who has the right to become Islam’s caliph?) From the time of the Prophet’s death until the Mongols sacked Baghdad in 1258, caliphs ruled over Muslims and presided over the Muslim expansion throughout the Middle East, Asia, Africa and Europe. These were the caliphates; some beneficent, some warmongering, in concept not unlike any other empire or dynasty."

Bush's use of the word (an excerpt from the article)...."The enemy, he said—by which he clearly meant the Islamic terrorist enemy—wants to “extend the caliphate,” “establish a caliphate,” and “spread their caliphate.”

I don't think Bush is even using the word correctly, but to his credit this is a quote from a Democratic speech writer--“Bush has been successful in defining terms in his own way,” said Steve Ebbins, a former Democratic speechwriter. “[The Bush administration] has captured the language. If you control the language, you control the message and are able to sway people’s attitude toward your policy. It’s a policy-endorsing mechanism.”

One of the most interesting comments about Bush and his communication strategy, I heard when I was at a small group breakfast with Dick Gephardt. He said that despite the flaws that the American people can see in Bush, what they can't see past is his focus on Terror. He went on to say that when you look at Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, Safety is Number 2 after hunger. So by focusing everyone on safety, every other issue is less relevant.

Friday, October 06, 2006

The Boss and Bush

Dukes of Hazzard was ahead of its time. Watching a re-run over the weekend, it is apparent that Boss Hog is a larger-than-life caricature of our own real life president G.W. Bush. Anytime something’s awry, it’s got to be those Duke boys...Chase ‘em and Lock ‘em up. The parallels to Bush’s fascination with Iraq post 9/11 and his use of "terror " fear as a crutch are hard to ignore. While Iraq may not be the model of innocence of the Duke boys, maybe G.W. Bush is the real J.D. Hogg.

Tuesday, October 03, 2006

What is a good Deal?

The few times I've watched Deal or No Deal...I've painfully watched contestants give up large sums of money in hopes of the big $1 million. It's amazing how caught up contestants get in the frenzy of the chance of winning $1 million. I frustratingly watch thinking I should pull out my computer and start modeling this on Excel to figure out the probabilities and expected outcomes. Alas I think I would find myself too extreme, if I go to analyzing a game show, so I can never bring myself to do it (though i secretly try to do it in my head). Thankfully some statisticians did it for me. Read here for their findings as printed in the USA Today.

What I found most interesting is that without calculators, the constestants got surprisingly close to the expected outcomes. The average values of all 26 cases is $131,477. The average from the 47 contestants has been $116,763, only 11% lower than the average. You have to assume that the house is taking some of that spread. So in my opinion I think the contestants are astoundingly accurate. Maybe we aren't so bad at math afterall...and when it comes to money we might just be mathematical geniuses. No longer will I shout in frustration when a contestant goes for the big one, because I know that in the end, the average contestant will be ok.

Saturday, September 30, 2006

America the Obese

There is no need for statistics when the truth is obvious...Americans are overweight. The striking thing is that unlike evolution that takes millions of years to affect change, we are doing it in mere decades making "Survival of the Fittest" seem nothing more than a mere joke. That being said, I am not going to blast the American population. Surely it is our own fault, and no one can deny that, but we can't really be blamed. The confluence of events creating the perfect storm are only now visible with hindsight...processed foods, sedentary jobs, and eating out. And even though these factors are clearly and have been clearly visible, their negative impacts took years to play out in plumper people. While I am going to give the American public a free pass for the last 2 decades, there is no more time to deny responsibility of our big fat mess.

But why does this issue even need to be addressed, shouldn't it be just treated as an individual issue? If someone is ok with being overweight, isn't that their choice? The answer should be no. While the effects on other people are not as obvious as second hand smoke, there is an effect of a person's obesity on the rest of the country. Effects, for example, are future strains on the healthcare system and medicare, loss of productivity from not only the invididual, but also the loss of productivity from the individuals relatives and friends who have to spend time, energy, and emotion caring for the obese and their heart diseases, diabetes, and slew of medical problems, procedures, and surgeries. No matter what people want to eat and no matter how much they don't want to exercise this is not a fair burden on our friends, family, and the country's tax revenues.

Can we as a nation find ways to help curb this epidemic that individuals on a general level show little ability to kick on their own? Taking matters into its own hands, New York City is proposing to prohibit restaurants from using artificial trans fats. While I laud the attention and action directed toward the issue, this is not the complete answer. First and foremost necessary is education. Could an average american tell you how many calories there are in a bagel, in a slice of pizza, in a double cheeseburger, or even a casaer salad? No way. People don't even know what they are eating. And this is no where more evident than in the success of the whatever the latest fad diet, whether it be atkins, zone, south beach, etc. As if there is some magical quick fix. That is proof that americans just don't get it. Nutrition education needs to be a class in our education system now as important as math, history, and biology. And we need to start from the beginning...every grade starting from first should have a health and wellness class, that's how dumb we are on this issue.

Education at the earliest levels may save the next generation but we have 30 years of trouble coming our way starting now, before any of that education makes any difference. Where New York city fails in its proposal is that it only addresses such a single element of the problem - food consumed at restaurants.

I believe we can take dramatic steps toward trimming the fat (literally) of our nation, with an elegant stroke. We need to appeal to our motivations that are more powerful than desire for ice cream and pizza on the couch in front of the tv. And that is Greed. If I may quote Gordon Gecko, "Greed, for lack of a better word, is good." What if the government offered a $1000 tax break to every adult that was within the recommended body fat percentages? I bet we would see a lot off people work to maintain that. But so many of americans are now so far from being anywhere close to that number. I think there should be another tax break, say $500, for anyone who improves 5% on their body fat percentage over a year. (no gaming the system, you only get improvment points if you improve from the trough. Not up one year, down the next stuff). By appealing to our senses of greed, the american people will find their own way...not just avoiding artificial trans fats at restaurants. They will do whatever works, eat better, walk run, swim, whatever. And they should generally feel pretty motivated because really how much more incentive should one need than money, vanity, and health...Now that is what i call a perfect storm to get us out of this mess.

Friday, September 08, 2006

Forget Marbury - it's time for the Greeks!

Team USA loses to Greece in the basketball world championship? Huh? I thought this was the new Team USA...not the hot dog team of Allen Iverson and one-man shows that won the bronze in the Olympics. I thought this was the Coach K team that had team buy-in from Carmello, Lebron, and Dwayne. I guess not. Where did the Greeks come from and why are they so good? Are the international rules that different that the US players are seemingly at a disadvantage? To my earlier comments about free throw shooting, I think the Greeks' excellent shooting helps prove that high field goal percentages and making your free throws are hard to defend. (I wish i had the time to mathematically prove how inept the NBA is at taking advantage of the free points the game offers. And I stand by my comments that any GM that doesn't have a free throw % component to the compensation is a FOOL.)

If the Greeks are this great, why aren't they in the NBA. I think the Dolan's need to take a hard look at themselves and the $130mm they are paying to the Knick players. The Knicks have one of the highest if not the highest salary payouts in the league and the absolute worst record in the NBA. How does that make any sense? Billy Beane of the A's would be disgusted. My vote, take that $130mm and see how many Greeks that gets you. I'd rather have the Greek national team than the Knicks anyday. Heck, I'll take stadium shwarma and hummus. I'll save the franks for the Yankees games.

Friday, September 01, 2006

Agassi Alive, But Baghdatis deserves respect

Agassi was the underdog against #8 in the world Baghdatis last night, but it was Agassi who dominated early winning the first 2 sets handily. That said, Baghdatis showed his own fortitude coming from 2 sets down to tie the match and even go up a break in the 5th set. What amazed me the most was Baghdatis's play in the fifth set with his legs visibly cramping up to the point where he couldn't stand. He some how pulled himself together and played out the final games with great shots and still gave Agassi a run for his money. This also shows Agassi's age in true colors. There should never have been a chance at all for Baghdatis to get back into this match and Agassi let him back in. I found myself frustrated at Agassi's inability to finish the match especially after Baghdatis's cramps. With that said, I can't wait until Saturday's next Agassi match. It's interesting what age does in that he is an underdog this year...it is only just last year that Agassi was a US Open finalist.

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

A-ga-ssi

It cannot be denied how riveting last night's tennis was in Agassi's first round match at his final US Open. Loomed with the backdrop of his retirment, every shot, every ace, every miss, and every break took on momunental proportions. After long and tiring traveling the previous night, I tried to will myself to bed, but alas I couldn't pull away. Agassi up a break in the first set, then loses a break, back to on serve, 1st tie break - Agassi loses? Wait this is not how it is supposed to go in what everyone has to hope will be a 1991-Jimmy-Connor-like run. 2nd set - another tie break? - Agassi wins - phew - at least back to even. 3rd set - Agassi down not one but 2 breaks? My heart drops. All is lost. Emotionally I invested in to the match and at times it is exhilarating and at times I wish i hadn't invested as much as we were on the brink of losing. I started rationalizing..."It is irrelevant if Agassi loses in the first round...This is a celebration of a career's work and not a judgment of him at 36 yrs old. No matter what happens tonight the crowd in Flushing Meadows will appropriately give him a Standing O and all will be ok." While rationalizing helped me not to fall into the traps of despair, I didn't have to hold those feelings for long. Agassi breaks back twice and forces a 3rd set tie breaker and wins! Agassi up 2 sets to 1. All is back to right in the world and I am going to bed before I can get trapped again.

It is a game like this that makes me wish i were in New York with a chance to be in the stands shouting "A-ga-ssi" (accent on the last syllable).

Post script - surprisingly decent article from the USA today

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

Lebron 21?

I was one of the doubters of Lebron James really being 21 yrs old. He is a man child even more so than the reign man, Shawn Kemp. But unless this is a forgery...someone at espn found the birth certificate and verified it. So I am for the moment will give him credit for actually being 21.

Sunday, July 23, 2006

Ralphie Mae

I've seen Chris Rock live, and I've seen Dave Chappell live, but this guy Ralphie Mae is funny!

Friday, July 21, 2006

Quote of the Day - Ode to Marion Barry - 6

To conclude our series on the Mayor for Life, I leave you with the Immortal words of Marion Barry...

"Goddamn bitch set me up!"
- Marion Barry, Mayor for Life

Thursday, July 20, 2006

Quote of the day - Ode to Marion Barry - 5

"Even in our finest hour, we got a crack head on the stage".
- Chris Rock, referring to Marion Barry presence during the Million Man March

Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday James Callender!

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Quote of the day - Ode to Marion Barry - 4

We wish these quotes were actually said by the Mayor for Life, but we love these Marion Barry-isms nonetheless.

"First, it was not a strip bar, it was an erotic club. And second, what can I say? I'm a night owl."

"I am clearly more popular than Reagan. I am in my third term. Where's Reagan? Gone after two! Defeated by George Bush and Michael Dukakis no less."

"The laws in this city are clearly racist. All laws are racist. The law of gravity is racist."

"The contagious people of Washington have stood firm against diversity during this long period of increment weather."

"People have criticized me because my security detail is larger than the president's. But you must ask yourself: are there more people who want to kill me than who want to kill the president? I can assure you there are."

"The brave men who died in Vietnam, more than 100% of which were black, were the ultimate sacrifice."

"What right does Congress have to go around making laws just because they deem it necessary?"
- Marion Barry, Mayor for Life

Tuesday, July 18, 2006

Quote of the day - Ode to Marion Barry - 3

"There is a sort of an unwritten code in Washington, among the underworld and the hustlers and these other guys that I am their friend."
- Marion Barry, Mayor for Life...Explaining why he was upset at being robbed at gunpoint.

Monday, July 17, 2006

Quote of the day - Ode to Marion Barry - 2

"They made all this up to justify questioning me. It's all made up. I don't know what happened. Whatever they say was all made up."
- Marion Barry, Mayor for Life...responding to allegations by Park Police that he was found with a white substance under his nose and trace amounts of cocaine in his car.

Friday, July 14, 2006

Quote of the day - Ode to Marion Barry - 1

"Outside of the killings, DC has one of the lowest crime rates in the country."
- Marion Barry, Mayor for Life

Thursday, July 13, 2006

Ode to the Mayor for Life...

Washington DC was previously known as the "murder capital of the world". Even its basketball team was previously named the Washington Bullets. To stop crime in DC, they changed the name of the basketball team from the Bullets to now the Washington Wizards and viola the killings have stopped (sarcasm, but the name change thing is true). Washington has received renewed attention recently as as there have been 14 killings in the first 10 days of July.

I think in light of having DC's ailments back in the spotlight, it would be worthwhile to take a trip down memory lane and pay homage to the annointed Mayor for Life, Marion Barry.

For those of you who don't know, while in the DC council, Marion Barry was shot by terrorists in the DC district building probably giving his name a rise to fame in DC which he wisely parlayed into a run and victory into the Mayor's Office. Marion Barry was the 2nd Mayor of DC ever, and held the position for 12 years from 1979 to 1991, until he was arrested for cocaine usage in a sting operation orchestrated with the help of his girlfriend (caught on video tape and shown around the world).

But that only sidelined our hero for 2 yrs, as he returned to politics and sought to be re-elected to the Mayor's office. Did he succeed? Absolutely. He campaigned for a council member position and, of course, won under the slogan "He May Not Be Perfect, But He's Perfect for D.C." (i love it) Only to buy time until he could run for mayor again, which he did, winning 65% of the vote, and staying in office from 1995-1999. He's currently a council member in DC, even though he was caught with cocaine (yet again!) last year. To do Marion Barry full justice, we only have to revisit his quotes in history to get a insight into his legacy. So we will begin a series of quotes of the day in honor of Marion Barry.

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

World Series of Pop Culture

In a night where I couldn't fall asleep, I found myself flipping on to find The World Series of Pop Culture on VH1. Why did I not get a personal invite to this competition? Don't they know that I read Entertainment Weekly (real journalism...not a tabloid), have watched TV religiously as a kid, and love movies? I would be awesome at this thing. In fact, last night I was running approximately 80% hit rate on questions. For example, TV theme songs...2 missed answers by contestants...three's company and full house. I mean come on. Now admittedly this is only the first round, so the questions are likely to get more difficult. But give me time to study and I am confident in domination.

In fact I could put together the 3 man dream team with my be fellow bloggers - James Callender and Code Monkey. I would put Code Monkey on Music, I would put James Callender on Television, and I would put myself on Movies. We would be on our way to the grand prize. Though sadly the grand prize is only $250k (unlike the $1mm shows these days)...split 3 ways and after tax is not that much unless you have a 100% probability of victory. That said my confidence knows no bounds (we'll see if my tune changes when we see the questions in the final rounds).

Wimbledon Final - Federer v. Nadal

This match was decided on one point. After losing the first set 6-0, Nadal was playing brilliant tennis and up a break in the second against Federer. At 5-4, Nadal was serving for the set. He would double fault on the crucial 15-30, after having served an astonishing 80% first serve percentage for the match to that point. Giving Federer 2 break points on grass to get back control of the match which at this point in Federer’s career is an impossible thing to recover from. Federer would go on to win the 2nd set in a tie break, and up 2-0 on grass it’s over.

It is abundantly clear how great Federer is and how great he still can be…but it is impossible to ignore what can become of Raphael Nadal. He is a clay court specialist now thriving on the much faster grass surface…something people can rarely do (and rarely do the other way around going from grass to clay). For non-tennis aficionados, it seems weird that there is so much difference between tennis courts surfaces, but they are subtle. Clay plays slower and has bigger ball bounces; grass is much faster as the ball skids on the grass and stays much lower to the ground. To put it in perspective, Pete Sampras won 7 wimbeldons (14 total titles) but no French Opens. Boris Becker had 3 Wimbledons, but no French Opens. The great Bjorn Borg is an exception winning 5 Wimbledons and 6 French Opens (though never winning the US or Australian). Ivan Lendel won every Major except Wimbledon (including the Wimbledon loss in straight sets to Pat Cash – a 1 major title wonder) This is why Agassi is my favorite player – he won on EVERY surface all 4 major titles with 8 total career Finals wins. Federer has yet to win a French despite having won every other major at least once. But Nadal is showing prowess on grass, getting to this year’s final and showing some great volleying skills critical on the grass. The key to Nadal’s success on grass is speed. He chases down balls like Michael Chang which gives him a shot on this faster surface.

It is for these reasons that we need to seriously watch Nadal’s career. If he can master the slow and fast surfaces, he may vault himself into rarified air. Do you know how many times Federer has lost this year? Federer has only lost 3 times in the final match this year…and they were all to Nadal! Though admittedly all on clay. Nadal is proving to be a man that may have as close to as any one can have to getting Federer’s number…and now Nadal can play on grass. Nadal is only 20 yrs old, 2 Majors already won, and much time left to prove how great he can be.

Monday, July 10, 2006

American Idol Career Path

Chris Daughtry, one of my top picks in American Idol, has just signed his record deal. Yes by saying this I admit I watch American Idol. A.M. pointed it out to me, that the reason I like American Idol is because it is just like karoke...and who doesn't like a good Karoke time. I personally choose Bon Jovi - Livin' on a Prayer for my performances. I guess it is no coincidence that Chris Daughtry struck me since one of his performances is a cover of Bon Jovi's Wanted Dead or Alive. An outstanding question is will the Code Monkey Master and his music brethren accept Daughtry as the real deal or will he be banished because of his main stream exposure/acceptance?

World Cup Final - France v. Italy

My friend believes that the NBA is rigged (ala the game ending foul calls in favor of Wade in 2 of the Finals games). If France had won, cynics could certainly have believed the World Cup was rigged by giving Zindane a penalty kick in the first 10 min to give France its first and only goal on what looked like a ridiculously simple contact among players. But Italy won and thus it is hard to blame the outcome on officiating, so TSA maybe there is hope for a cynic, after all.

Zindane, Zindane, Zindane…oh mon dieu…what are we to think of you...retiring as the captain of the world cup team with the Final your last game…what a story…wait a minute it gets better, double overtime, and still tied, and you get to kick penalty kicks for the world championship…and what is this I hear – you are the BEST in history! This is your moment…or so the story could have been. Instead, you couldn’t hold your composure for 2 more minutes, you had to headbutt a guy’s chest. What--Did the guy call your mom fat? She probably is, get over it. And so your legacy ends as the headbutt guy. This will now be a lasting memory for big game mental follies and replacing the indelible Chris Webber time out as number 1 on my list. On the world stage, double overtime, a professional – inexcusable. Who knows with Zindane in the line up during the penalty kicks if the outcome would have been any different.

But can the French hate this guy…yes, but not completely. We must remember, without Zindane’s Academy Award winning flop in the first ten minutes, France wouldn’t have scored at all. So we would have never gotten to the overtimes for the head-butt to begin with.

So Congratulations Italy, sorry to Trezeguet of France who missed his penalty kick. And congratulations to Puma for winning the Sponsorship war over its brother Adidas.

And if you'd like to do some of your own headbutting - Enjoy this submission by J.R.

Friday, July 07, 2006

Quote of the day

"I'm hovering like a fly, waiting for the windshield on the freeway."
- Peter Gabriel, Genesis, Lamb Lies Down on Broadway

Thursday, July 06, 2006

Quote of the day

Peter Gibbons: I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing, and it was everything I thought it could be.
- Office Space

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

Quote of the day

Stephen: [speaking heavenward] Him? That can't be William Wallace. I'm prettier than this man.
-Braveheart

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Quote of the day

Madeline: I'm sorry, who are you again?
Fletch: I'm Frieda's boss.
Madeline: Who's Frieda?
Fletch: My secretary.
- Fletch

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Heat - Suns Game 6 Review

Stunned I am. What happened to the Mavs run and gun? What happened to the great Dirk Nowitzki - the 7 Footer who can shoot threes and drive to the basket (and who's skillset and height should make him the best player around). Was it the Heat defense backed by Riley coaching or the Mavs inexperience? Why does Dampiere deserve $60mm? (didn't i hear that was his contract size from the telecast)

As for those Mavs fans and viewers who didn't like the fouls on Wade at the end of the last two games, I say get over it. The Mavs had their chance to close this series in Game 3 and blew it. The Mavs had emotion at their back after losing 3 in a row (previously almost unthinkable) and coming to their home crowd with Stackhouse back. They had a 14 point lead and blew it.

I was all ready to write how the NBA's defensive rules on hand checking and others that have quickened the pace of the game so much that there is no defense and just track meet basketball ala Dallas vs. the Suns. But scrap that email...a slower hard hitting team just took the championship. Is it ironic that 2 questioned fouls in 2 separate games got so much attention when increasing the fouls on defense in general by league rule changes is one of the reasons the Mavs style is so potent!

There might be some who will be quick to annoint Dwyane Wade the king of the world and dismiss Shaq as riding the Wade wave. I am not so quick to do so. Wade has shown he is a big time player rising to the occasion that I previously commented that there is such lack of in the NBA. But let's not lose sight of the importance of Shaq. Without Shaq, Kobe got how far? Impressively to the 2nd round, but not to the finals like so many years prior. Without Shaq, Lebron got how far? 2nd round, but not to the finals. Single great players cannot win on their own. Even Michael Jordan had a constant Scottie Pippen and at the time fans truly appreciated the value of Scottie Pippen (as he was one of the ones chosen to be on the NBA top 50 of all time category, and the US olymplic dream team).

I am happy for the Heat, because I now like Shaq. I didn't always feel that way; I used to just believe he was a big body. But Shaq "gets it" and he wants to win. At least when he speaks, he speaks about the team and respect for Wade. He could be cocky and talk about how he is the one who got doubled teamed so much of the time to free up other players, but he doesn't. Overall I think Shaq was an underdog this year and proved he's still got something left. Though I can't have this discussion with out mentioning my disgust with his free throws. I don't understand how someone can have a bad free-throw percentage. It is the exact same shot in the exact same place every time. It should be automatic. In fact I think every GM is a FOOL for not including a salary penalty for low free throw percentages. They are free points that you have to take advantage of.

Lastly on the much talked about Mark Cuban...I am not sure I care enough to write about it, but this espn writer makes some interesting points in the second to last paragraph of his piece with the Iverson analogy. The ESPN Article

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

What's on the Radio?

For those of you who enjoy an electic wide variety of music, actually for anyone who enjoys music in general...you must try the yahoo radio. For free, you can create your "own" station and get only the songs you want played. If you have the time, you can rate specific songs, either "i love it" or "don't play again"...over time you get the most perfectly tuned radio station with any kind of music you want played. It's like an Ipod on the internet. But no downloading...just select your ratings right over the internet. Like one song by one artist but not all the rest of his stuff...no problem - just rate that one song. (ie. Rock me like a hurricane by the Scorpions)

Separately, Sunday Bloody Sunday by U2 is simply a fantastic song.
Check out this contribution from TSA http://www.break.com/movies/sundaybush.html

Code Monkey has alerted me to a simply amazing website...all the 80's videos! and they stream very easily.

Monday, June 19, 2006

Heat - Suns Game 5 Review

Wow! That is why they play the game.

This playoff season has been one of the most interesting and fun to watch in a long time. I believe there have been a record number of overtime games and we just saw one in the NBA Finals.

The Heat pull through in what I previously declared a must win game for the Heat in order to have a shot at the title, given the ridiculously unfair 2-3-2 format. We'll never know what Stackhouse there might have done, but I think it is a moot point because Howard and Harris both played extremely well. Defense on Dirk continues to be excellent.

Of this series, for me, Jason Terry is the surprise. That guy can play....drives to the basket and makes outside shots with a high shooting percentage. (I may be late in realizing this by not paying enough attention in the regular season)

As for the timeout that Josh Howard called...I am reminded of the Chris Webber ill fated timeout called that he didn't have during the NCAA Championship during the Fab 5 era. Alas since Webber's pro career has been mixed and uninspiring, the timeout will never be forgotten. But it turns out as I have read today that Josh Howard has had this problem before though in a just a regular season ACC game...can't compare to the NCAA championship or the NBA Finals game. (from epsn.com In college, on Feb. 24, 2002, Howard was with Wake Forest when he called a timeout he didn't have with 1.3 seconds left against Maryland. That's a technical foul, and Juan Dixon made 1-of-2 free throws to win the game)

After Game 2 when the Mavs were up 2-0, tradesports.com listed the mavs as 68% likely to win the championship. Now the market stands at even. And I agree. I think you have to give Game 6 to the Mavs coming off 3 loses in a row and returning home. Game 7, for the title, and I don't know who will win.

Friday, June 16, 2006

Heat - Suns Game 4 Review

"Rumors of my demise are greatly exaggerated." - Tom Sawyer

With 8 minutes left from effective elimination 2 games ago, Wade and the Heat have gone from thinking about fishing in the summer to trying to win a championship. Did the Heat play a great game on Thursday. Unclear. Or was it the emotionally defeated Mavericks after the previous game's loss that couldn't bring it. Either way we have a legitimate series and remember it took Dallas 7 games against San Antonio with an overtime, and 6 to get through the Suns...so they do not have a history of closing out big opponents in short order.

Though not an elimination game, the key and deciding game will be game 5. It is Miami's last opportunity at home and they have to win it before they go back to Dallas. (let's not get started on the 2-3-2 format - which i think is decidely unfair for the lower ranked team).

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Heat - Suns Game 3 Review

Wow...Was i wrong on many counts.

I again turned off the Game at the start of the 4th qtr. I confidently proclaimed the Heat done for the game and I therefore confidently claimed that the NBA finals were over and no longer worth watching and time to focus solely on the World Cup. Was I wrong.

Was I wrong about my previous comments that few have shown the ability to show up with the will to carry a team and defy defeat? Wade showed up to play!

Now we must watch on at least for one more home miami game. We have to give credit to the morale lift they are going to receive. Afterall when they were down 12 in the 4th qtr, the look in their eyes told me they were done. That look has to be gone now and that is 1/2 the battle.

My analysis of the Heat demise will have to wait at least one more game.

Monday, June 12, 2006

Heat - Suns Game 2 Review

I must admit...i couldn't bear to watch passed the 3rd qtr and I apparently I didn't need to.

While it would be very easy to say that Shaq was an unmitigated disaster in Game 2...I think further analysis points to more. Wade? Did he even show up this game? Shaq was held to only 5 points in the game, but Shaq was doubled teamed the entire game. You try playing 2 on 1 and tell me how well you do. But in theory this means there is a man open for Miami, yet no open man was able to convert. I believe this lies in the hands of Wade to create. If the rest of the Heat can't win at 4 on 3, then they have no business in the NBA finals.

Antoine Walker? I keep hearing how he was this great starter for the Celtics and big scorer and how he took this role change. He doesn't look like a star to me. The only positive I have to say for Miami is Haslem. He has shown he can contain Dirk (at least up until now) and that is no small feat...which makes Miami's struggles even greater than they would appear (ie these beats would have been even worse without Haslem's defense).

Watching this series and this playoffs had me thinking of the times of Michael Jordan. It is I think so easy to see how great he was, even more so in retrospect. The guy refused to lose and had the ability to carry his team and will it to win (no matter how many people guarded him). I definitely don't see that in Shaq (ever- historically or in the future). Lebron James shows glimpses of that every so often...but i will not be in line to be claiming him the next Michael Jordan, despite what Nike will have you believe with their blatant #23.

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Heat - Suns Game 1 Review

Game 1 was lost on 1 issue…missed free throws from both shaq and wade. With fouls to give, if shaq can’t make free throws he is nullified as a serious threat to the mavs no matter how big he is.

Shaq and Wade are clearly the better players vs. Nowitzki and Terry. But what the Heat can’t match is the SPEED. The Mavs are just too fast. The transition offense leads to easy baskets. The heat could win if the game was played on half a court, but running the distance they are no match. Nowitzki will not be a dud in Game 2.